Strategic Integration and System Dynamics in Seabed Warfare: Bridging Technological Advances and Strategic Imperatives
- The Strategic Gap in Seabed Warfare: While technological advancements in seabed warfare, such as autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), are rapidly progressing, the integration of these technologies into a cohesive, long-term strategic framework is underdeveloped. This lack of strategic alignment risks unintended geopolitical consequences and underscores the need for policies that incorporate these technologies into broader security objectives.
- Application of Systems Thinking: The thesis introduces an innovative methodological approach that applies systems thinking and system dynamics, particularly using Colin S. Gray's General Theory of Strategy and system archetypes like "Limits to Success" and "Tragedy of the Commons." This approach helps analyze the strategic dimensions of seabed warfare, revealing how short-term technological successes may lead to long-term systemic constraints or geopolitical risks.
- Importance of Strategic System Archetypes: Through examples like France's seabed warfare strategy and the European Union's Maritime Security Strategy, the thesis demonstrates the utility of strategic system archetypes as diagnostic tools. These tools aid in understanding the complex interactions and long-term consequences of seabed warfare policies, helping to align military actions with strategic objectives.
- Need for Comprehensive Strategic Frameworks: The thesis calls for expanding future research to include geopolitical, legal, and ethical dimensions in seabed warfare strategies. Without a well-rounded strategic framework, nations risk escalating tensions or engaging in conflicts that impact global stability. The integration of military, technological, and policy aspects is essential for achieving long-term security goals.
Chairperson
